3 ms·
What "both" arguments are so-called alarmists using? What's an alarmist, exactly? And yes, the objective is to stop using fossil fuels. That's not exactly a se
by triceratops 8mo ago
What "both" arguments are so-called alarmists using? What's an alarmist, exactly?
And yes, the objective is to stop using fossil fuels. That's not exactly a secret agenda, it's the whole fucking point.
- t0bia_s 8mo agoWhat is denier, exactly? Seriously, there is no debate with this rethoric.
- triceratops 8mo agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_denial https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_denial You didn't answer either of my questions. Even though I asked first.
- t0bia_s 8mo agoYou missing the point, again.
- triceratops 8mo agoDo you have a point? Please communicate better. I may well be speaking to a bot.
- t0bia_s 8mo agoStop using labeling and listen other opinions better. Your rethoric could be used by other side with switched words - this type of debate does not bring anything new that others could learn from. You belive in something, others don't or vice versa.
- triceratops 8mo ago> Your rethoric could be used by other side with switched words Yawn. "Both sides are equally valid" is a tired argument. Truth and lies are not the same.
- t0bia_s 8mo agoThe fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt. - Bertrand Russell
- triceratops 8mo agoBetter stupid and right than intelligent and wrong.