4 ms·
We do not need to re-litigate the legitimacy of fashion whenever HNers take offence at the implication that they too are human. This stuff is has all been prov
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 8mo ago
We do not need to re-litigate the legitimacy of fashion whenever HNers take offence at the implication that they too are human.
This stuff is has all been proven, time and time again.
- GuestFAUniverse 8mo agoSoftware is also _a tool_. I do not redesign my (physical) toolbox multiple times per decade. On the contrary: I use my grandfather's drill, because it lasts longer and gets the job done more reliably then the "redesigned" crap that is most of the current market. Do I still use FVWM2? Hell no... Could I work the same like 30 years ago, if all the fashion wouldn't have happened: absolutely. The major improvements weren't cosmetics.
- wpm 8mo agoRe-litigating assertions is sometimes incredibly useful. Firefox isn't in the spot it's in because it doesn't copy Material Poo/Liquid Ass enough, or because it doesn't look like Chrome enough, or that in a somewhat crowded market just doing your best to blend in with the rest is a good strategy for growth or popularity. Refusing to follow fashions that make your browser harder to use or uglier might not be a terrible idea. Mind you, I'm not trying to claim that it absolutely is a great idea, or that Mozilla should copy the Winamp skin and go backwards, but goddamn, have some guts. But I guess it's an axiom, that if you don't copy how everyone else looks, you're doomed.