3 ms·
The page has no discussion of prior art like PCG[1], and no results from standard tests like Diehard[2] or TestU1[3]. It might be good, but I'd stick with prov
by magicalhippo 8mo ago
The page has no discussion of prior art like PCG[1], and no results from standard tests like Diehard[2] or TestU1[3].
It might be good, but I'd stick with proven alternatives.
[1]: https://www.pcg-random.org/ https://www.pcg-random.org/
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diehard_tests https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diehard_tests
[3]: https://simul.iro.umontreal.ca/testu01/tu01.html https://simul.iro.umontreal.ca/testu01/tu01.html