Transcendental moral principles can still be secular. One that I find compelling is that Rawls' veil of ignorance lets us imagine that we might be on either si

Transcendental moral principles can still be secular. One that I find compelling is that Rawls' veil of ignorance lets us imagine that we might be on either side of a conflict, and that therefore moral actions are equitable to both sides. This gives us a secular morality that doesn't come with the baggage of religious outgroup dynamics.