4 ms·
It would not have hurt to make a version of wikipedia, that will work without JS for the most part, including all that is important. However, that requires a mi
by zelphirkalt 8mo ago
It would not have hurt to make a version of wikipedia, that will work without JS for the most part, including all that is important. However, that requires a mindset for supporting static pages, which is mostly what W should consist of, and would require a skill set, that is not so common among web developers these days. Such a static version would be much easier to test as well, since all the testing framework would need to do is simple requests, instead of awaiting client-side JS execution resulting in mutation of content on the page.