> This struct we saw earlier had 700+ of optional fields. In Rust you would never design a struct like this. You would pick a different layout long before reach

> This struct we saw earlier had 700+ of optional fields. In Rust you would never design a struct like this. You would pick a different layout long before reaching 700 Options. But SQL schemas often look like this. Really? I've never had to do any serious db work in my career, but this is a surprise to me.