5 ms·
Agreed. As I said I think the problem is one of persistent surveillance. This is only going to get worse as technology develops and it becomes possible for gove
by _djo_ 14y ago
Agreed. As I said I think the problem is one of persistent surveillance. This is only going to get worse as technology develops and it becomes possible for governments and police departments to deploy hundreds or thousands of insect-sized drones through our cities.
That's why I think focusing on drones obscures the real issue and makes it more difficult to have the serious and very necessary debate about whether we want to live in societies where the state is able to track you persistently in any public space.
We already have the beginnings of something similar in cities like London, where thousands of CCTV cameras are every bit as invasive of our privacy as a police drone flying overhead would be.
In other words this battle against the police use of drones like the Predator could be 'won' and it would probably not make any difference to the police's ability to track you with video and audio surveillance.
- wladimir 14y agoYes, I think the underlying reason that drones are brought into these kind of discussions is because people are terrified of armed drones, especially autonomous ones. They make war cheap in the same way as CCTVs make surveillance cheap. But that's a completely different issue and shouldn't distract from the domestic surveillance one which is (at the moment) much more pressing.