5 ms·
I picked up Claude today after being away and using only ChatGPT and Gemini for a while. I was pretty impressed with how they’ve improved user experience. If I
by baxtr 7mo ago
I picked up Claude today after being away and using only ChatGPT and Gemini for a while.
I was pretty impressed with how they’ve improved user experience. If I had to guess, I’d say Anthropic has better product people who put more attention to detail in these areas.
- abustamam 7mo agoI agree! I recently migrated from ChatGPT to Claude and it is just superior in every way. It doesn't blather on the at the end ask me for clarification. It's succinct and clarifies vital information before providing a solution.
- beachy 7mo agoI held off migrating from ChatGPT to Claude Code due to being a laggard that lived in the Eclipse world. I didn't believe what I was told that I wouldn't be writing code any more. Pushed into action by recent PR gaslighting from OpenAI, I jumped to claude code and they were right - I barely venture into the IDE now and certainly don't need an integration.
- vostrocity 7mo agoVoice input is still far less accurate than OpenAI's unfortunately, otherwise I would have already switched.
- abustamam 7mo agoOh interesting. I've never used voice input on either so I can't comment, but understandable why you can't switch if it's disruptive to your workflow to do so.
- gizmodo59 7mo agoChatGPT has given more for my 20$ than any other vendor. And that’s not even considering codex which is so good and the limits are much much higher
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- bwat49 7mo agoyeah claude is great... but only if you pay $100-$200 a month
- beefsack 7mo agoMany people buy two separate Claude pro subscriptions and that makes the limit become a non-issue. It works surprisingly well when you tend to hit the 5 hourly limit after a few hours, and hit the weekly limit after 4-5 days. $40 vs $100 is significant for a lot of people.
- smartbit 7mo agoThanks for the tip, didn’t think of using 2 subscriptions at the same company. When reaching a limits, I switch to GLM 4.7 as part of a subscription GLM Coding Lite offered end 2025 $28/year. Also use it for compaction and the like to save tokens.
- ruszki 7mo agoI hit limit of Pro in about 30 minutes, 1 hour max. And only when I use a single session, and when I don't use it extensively, ie waits for my responses, and I read and really understand what it wants, what it does. That's still just 1-2 hours/5 hours. What do you do to avoid that?
- AlexeyBelov 7mo agoYou're probably having long sessions, i.e. repeated back-and-forth in one conversation. Also check if you pollute context with unneeded info. It can be a problem with large and/or not well structured codebases.
- ruszki 7mo agoThe last time I used pro, it was a brand new Python rest service with about 2000 lines generated, which was solely generated during the session. So how I say to Claude that use less context, when there was 0 at the beginning, just my prompt?
- sreekanth850 7mo agoTrue. Everytime when i ask something gpt, it use to spit out long stories. Claude ans gemini are always straight to point.
- twelvedogs 7mo agoI bullied it into giving me concise answers, now it starts every answer with "just quickly" or something similar but it gets straight to the point
- sreekanth850 7mo agoI always add no nonsense no bullshit at the end of my prompt. Its annoying how itries to please the user.
- forgotpwd16 7mo agoNo need to do it yourself in every prompt. Just put it in Custom instructions under Personalization.
- sreekanth850 7mo agoThank you never saw this.
- forgotpwd16 7mo agoSeems not very known that ChatGPT got a few style/tone choices besides default. One is specifically being concise and plain.
- hamasho 7mo agoI agree, but in general those chat apps have relatively bad user experiences for multibillion BtoC company. I used to have a lot of surprises and frustrations while using Claude Code / Desktop, and still encounter issues, but it's the best in major LLM services.
- majormajor 7mo agoIt's funny cause, you know, fixing all those little nitty gritty things should be practically automatic with their own offerings... have your agent put in a lot of instrumentation... have it chase down bugs or dead-end user-journeys... have it go make the changes to fix it... I've seen these tools work for this kinda stuff sometimes... you'd think nobody would be better at it than the creators of the tools.