If you look up history more accurately you'll find this isn't true. Or at least, it's not the whole story. Europeans took over India from muslim conquerors. Sam

If you look up history more accurately you'll find this isn't true. Or at least, it's not the whole story. Europeans took over India from muslim conquerors. Same with most of the places you mention. European colonization is the reason slavery stopped in those places. Hong Kong never had slaves, and if you talk with people now they'll be pretty unanimous in that Hong Kong, the colony, was a better place than it is now. That was what muslims did in Africa, btw, better known as "black gold". Meaning for a millenium all muslim economies were 100% built on exploitation of slaves. And three guesses why it was called "black" gold ... Oh and it wasn't one state. Muslims massacred their own empires out of existence every 2 centuries or so. But every empire they had was built on slavery. The first ("the propet" was a slaver and a slavetrader. In case you don't know: slaver means he invaded villages and killed people until the rest accepted to become slaves), the last, and every one in between. Oh and a question: What is Hong Kong now? Because it isn't free. And yet, somehow, it's not called a Chinese colony? Why not? That's what it is, and it's worse than it was as a British colony.