3 ms·
The false positive rate was 66% for "automatic scan" and 100% (!) for "deep scan". In other words, you can get these numbers if your deep scan filter is isSusp
by decimalenough 7mo ago
The false positive rate was 66% for "automatic scan" and 100% (!) for "deep scan".
In other words, you can get these numbers if your deep scan filter is isSuspicious() { return true; }.
- antonvs 7mo agoBrb, applying for YC funding for my new AI-based phishing detection system. (‘return true’ is just a very optimized neural network after all!)
- dataflow 7mo agoI think there might be a confusion here? The 100% seems like the true positive rate (correct detection), not the false positive rate?
- decimalenough 7mo agoNope, 9 of 9 legit sites were incorrectly flagged: > The tradeoff is that it flagged all 9 of the legitimate sites in our dataset as suspicious
- dataflow 7mo agoSorry, I think I had my wires crossed somewhere. Yeah, I see now. That's crazy/hilarious.