4 ms·

This argument can be used, and has been used, about every innovation in automation since the dawn of the industrial revolution.

• ducttapecrown 8mo ago
  It is not the technology that sucks ever more money out of the populace, it's the people at the top!
• deleted 8mo ago
  [deleted]
• ezst 8mo ago
  No it hasn't. Work mechanisation throughout history has resulted in a shift from manual labour to one that's more intellectual in nature. Modern AI believers pretend that it will take over those jobs soon as well. This would essentially bring us to a cross-roads between, on one hand, a utopia with UBI and people not needing to work (because their labour is unnecessary), or a dystopia, where few technocratic "lords" own the means of work automation and rule over a submissive world. I don't think it takes a genius to guess where this is heading in our current political climate. Personally, I'm not scared about any of that, because I don't believe LLMs to be very potent as an AI tool. Robotic militias (remotely controlled by BI or AI) seem a much more tangible threat.
• GreenWatermelon 8mo ago
  Yeah, and for good reason. The invitation of the light bulb meant factory owners could force workers into 16 hours shifts. The main beneficiaries of new tech were always the capital owners. Workers had to literally fight and die for our 8-hour workdays and 5-days workweek. This is still going on today: the massive gains from automation are being hoarded by the wealthy capital owners, while workers struggle to make ends meet.
  • tptacek 8mo ago
    Ok but also I want to light my house with lightbulbs, not with animal-fat candles.