3 ms·

It's not insider trading, but surely it's a conflict of interesting? If you ignore all the specific name calling, isn't it still quite wrong that one minister c

It's not insider trading, but surely it's a conflict of interesting? If you ignore all the specific name calling, isn't it still quite wrong that one minister can financially bet against the administration?

andsoitis 8mo ago
> isn't it still quite wrong that one minister can financially bet against the administration? Why?
- chrisXOXO 8mo ago
  Because it encourages him to work against the administration.