4 ms·
You did not pay the tariffs. You bore the cost of the tariffs. Those are not the same thing. The refund is due to the party that got the bill for the tariff and
by cvoss 7mo ago
You did not pay the tariffs. You bore the cost of the tariffs. Those are not the same thing. The refund is due to the party that got the bill for the tariff and paid it-- the importer. What you paid for was for the business not to go bankrupt while this was occurring. If the business wants to refund you for that, they can choose to do so. But you are not owed a refund.
- throwaway667555 7mo agoCongress can act to pay back the economically harmed party, the consumer. They won't because we live in an oligarchy.
- flawn 7mo agoThis answer is the incarnation of capitalismmaxxing. Economically speaking you're correct - but morally definitely not, companies are for the bigger part not the harmed party here.
- wpm 7mo agoLook you can write the funny numbers in whatever accounting mumbo jumbo you want, but I paid more to cover the cost to the supplier == I paid the tariffs.
- avs733 7mo agoI don't think the commenter you are responding too thinks this is a good thing - they are just describing that it is. I read it as just a blunt summary of how absurd this situation is.
- greybeard69 7mo agoNo one cares.
- ajam1507 7mo ago"I didn't kill him, officer. It was the bullet."
- wat10000 7mo agoIn other words: the president can break the law and fuck you over by transferring a nice chunk of your money to big companies, and none of the lawbreakers will be held accountable in any way, and you're not owed a dime in restitution.
- evan_ 7mo agoSo on Earth 2 in which everything is the same except these tariffs hadn't been enacted, would today's consumer prices be the same or lower?
- WesleyJohnson 7mo agoWhat businesses were legitimately going to go bankrupt by the increased tariffs? I'm not defending the tariffs, mind you, but I don't buy that every company had to increase prices to offset the additional taxes. Many could've taken the hit and been fine, except profits would be down and shareholders would be angry.
- crazygringo 7mo agoLots of them. Profit margins in many sectors are low, lower than the cost of the tariffs. > except profits would be down and shareholders would be angry. Right. So when profits turn into losses, you expect shareholders to be OK with the stock price falling to zero and they lose their entire investment? You think this is "fine"?
- missingdays 7mo agohttps://www.greaterthangames.com/blogs/news/greater-than-games-team-reduced-in-response-to-tariff-crisis https://www.greaterthangames.com/blogs/news/greater-than-gam... Effectively closed
- x3ro 7mo agoLet's call it what it is, a massive wealth transfer from the general public to companies, and transitively (primarily) to the super-rich. Just because it's legal that they are robbing us blind does not make it right.
- laweijfmvo 7mo agoi personally paid, to UPS and DHL iirc, tariffs. so maybe i wasn’t actually directly billed the tariff as the importer, but i 100% paid it.
- DANmode 7mo agoNow, was it a tariff you paid, or a carrier fee related to the tariff?
- dragonwriter 7mo agoDelivery companies act as tariff agents and collect tariffs for Customs and Border Protection, so, yes, if you were the importer of record on a delivery, it is quite likely that you paid the tariff via the delivery company. These are likely to be refunded, because even if you were the purchaser of the product, you were the importer of record and paid the tariff, not a downstream buyer who paid an increased price because of the tariffs.
- DANmode 7mo agoI’m one of the importers of record. This should be interesting!
- robotresearcher 7mo agoSimilarly, the importers voluntarily paid the tariffs. They could choose to go out of business, go to jail, be sued into bankruptcy, or pay. Totally at their discretion.