3 ms·

Related, I often work with markdown docs (usually created via CLI agents like Claude Code) and need to collaborate with others in google docs, which is extremel

Related, I often work with markdown docs (usually created via CLI agents like Claude Code) and need to collaborate with others in google docs, which is extremely markdown-unfriendly[1], so I built small quality-of-life CLI tools to convert Gdocs -> md and vice versa, called gdoc2md and md2gdoc: https://pchalasani.github.io/claude-code-tools/integrations/google-docs/ https://pchalasani.github.io/claude-code-tools/integrations/... They handle embedded images in both directions. There are similar gsheet2csv and csv2gsheet tools in the same repo. Similar to the posted tool, there is a first time set up involving creating an app, that is documented above. [1] in the sense there are multiple annoying clicks/steps to get a markdown doc to look good in Gdocs. You'd know the pain if you've tried it.

greymalik 8mo ago
Paste from markdown (Chrome only) works _really_ well for me. What are the extra steps you’re running into?
- d4rkp4ttern 8mo ago
  Interesting, in my Arc browser, I just tried File -> open -> upload -> blah.md and it does seem to render fine. This exact thing did not work a few weeks ago, meaning the various header markers etc showed up as raw "##" etc, and I had to further select something like "open as new doc" to finally make it look good.
  - z3ugma 8mo ago
    Right click > "Paste from Markdown" instead of just straight up pasting in
    - d4rkp4ttern 8mo ago
      Images wouldn't work though, right? I'd be amazed if that worked. My CLI tools handle those.
      - chrisweekly 8mo ago
        Obsidian has become almost an operating system for working with markdown. Its Live View / Edit mode is excellent (WYSIWYG) and its ability to accept pasted content and handle it appropriately is good and getting better. Its plugin/extension ecosystem is robust (and has a low barrier to entry), and now that it has a CLI I expect to see an acceleration of clever workflows and integrations. No affiliation, just a very happy ~early adopter and daily user.
        d4rkp4ttern 8mo ago
        I’m intrigued by their recent CLI release as well. I’ll have to check out the markdown edit support too, thanks
        Lord_Zero 8mo ago
        BUT the main supported sync module is cloud only they wont let you self host for free which is really shitty and lame.
        quietsegfault 8mo ago
        [dead]
        chrisweekly 8mo ago
        Wow, that's a strong opinion and harsh words that come across as really entitled, and probably unfair. From my PoV, they're a tiny, scrappy, transparent and likeable company who built and maintain a fantastic software application that radically improved ~everything about my daily workflow and PKM. I get more value out of Obsidian in a day than most other apps in their entire lifespan. The core app is free! They have to eat. I'd probably throw $ at them even if they didn't charge a few bucks / month for Sync. (Which works flawlessly.) Sure it'd be cool if you could self-host their Sync module -- but many Obsidian users use other DIY approaches for sync; in the end it's markdown files on a local disk, do with it what you will.
        joquarky 8mo ago
        git + cron
- rendaw 8mo ago
  After reading a comment here about how google docs had awesome markdown handling (I didn't know it supported it at all) I tried it out and it was bad to the extent that I don't think I'll use it again. I can't remember everything, but for instance it kept the syntactic newlines that should be swallowed during rich text conversion and IIRC it had issues with code too. And then you have to edit it thereafter with their WYSIWYG editor. I was hoping there was an actual "markdown mode" where I could avoid getting into wars about whether this bullet point is in a new list or part of the previous list, etc. IIRC there's no way to get markdown back out either, once you've realized you made the wrong choice.
ritzaco 8mo ago
interesting we have a very similar internal flow - we like working in markdown but our customers want to leave feedback in Google docs, so we also have an md -> gdoc tool. We don't do the reverse as we ask them to only leave comments/suggested changes and we apply those directly to the markdown and re-export. I ran into similar issues as you for the image handling, and the work around I use is to use pandoc to convert to docx as a first step and then import that as a Google Doc using the API, as Google Docs seems to handle docx much better than markdown from what I've seen.

greymalik 8mo ago

Paste from markdown (Chrome only) works _really_ well for me. What are the extra steps you’re running into?

d4rkp4ttern 8mo ago
Interesting, in my Arc browser, I just tried File -> open -> upload -> blah.md and it does seem to render fine. This exact thing did not work a few weeks ago, meaning the various header markers etc showed up as raw "##" etc, and I had to further select something like "open as new doc" to finally make it look good.
- z3ugma 8mo ago
  Right click > "Paste from Markdown" instead of just straight up pasting in
  - d4rkp4ttern 8mo ago
    Images wouldn't work though, right? I'd be amazed if that worked. My CLI tools handle those.
    - chrisweekly 8mo ago
      Obsidian has become almost an operating system for working with markdown. Its Live View / Edit mode is excellent (WYSIWYG) and its ability to accept pasted content and handle it appropriately is good and getting better. Its plugin/extension ecosystem is robust (and has a low barrier to entry), and now that it has a CLI I expect to see an acceleration of clever workflows and integrations. No affiliation, just a very happy ~early adopter and daily user.
      - d4rkp4ttern 8mo ago
        I’m intrigued by their recent CLI release as well. I’ll have to check out the markdown edit support too, thanks
      - Lord_Zero 8mo ago
        BUT the main supported sync module is cloud only they wont let you self host for free which is really shitty and lame.
        quietsegfault 8mo ago
        [dead]
        chrisweekly 8mo ago
        Wow, that's a strong opinion and harsh words that come across as really entitled, and probably unfair. From my PoV, they're a tiny, scrappy, transparent and likeable company who built and maintain a fantastic software application that radically improved ~everything about my daily workflow and PKM. I get more value out of Obsidian in a day than most other apps in their entire lifespan. The core app is free! They have to eat. I'd probably throw $ at them even if they didn't charge a few bucks / month for Sync. (Which works flawlessly.) Sure it'd be cool if you could self-host their Sync module -- but many Obsidian users use other DIY approaches for sync; in the end it's markdown files on a local disk, do with it what you will.
        joquarky 8mo ago
        git + cron
rendaw 8mo ago
After reading a comment here about how google docs had awesome markdown handling (I didn't know it supported it at all) I tried it out and it was bad to the extent that I don't think I'll use it again. I can't remember everything, but for instance it kept the syntactic newlines that should be swallowed during rich text conversion and IIRC it had issues with code too. And then you have to edit it thereafter with their WYSIWYG editor. I was hoping there was an actual "markdown mode" where I could avoid getting into wars about whether this bullet point is in a new list or part of the previous list, etc. IIRC there's no way to get markdown back out either, once you've realized you made the wrong choice.

ritzaco 8mo ago

interesting we have a very similar internal flow - we like working in markdown but our customers want to leave feedback in Google docs, so we also have an md -> gdoc tool. We don't do the reverse as we ask them to only leave comments/suggested changes and we apply those directly to the markdown and re-export. I ran into similar issues as you for the image handling, and the work around I use is to use pandoc to convert to docx as a first step and then import that as a Google Doc using the API, as Google Docs seems to handle docx much better than markdown from what I've seen.