3 ms·
I'll make the same comment I did on the other post about this. Either document how it differs from FreeBSD jails or give it some other name. Anything else is as
by ggm 8mo ago
I'll make the same comment I did on the other post about this. Either document how it differs from FreeBSD jails or give it some other name. Anything else is asking for confusion.
- LargoLasskhyfv 8mo agoDoes the third entry of the FAQ not suffice?
- ggm 8mo agoNo. A feature table would help. An abstraction/layer diagram. A lot more. Could bastille port to it as-is? How about podman?
- LargoLasskhyfv 8mo ago> Could bastille port to it as-is? How about podman? He wrote things like these are out of scope. Just light and robust jails without further external dependencies.
- PunchyHamster 8mo agoso it's useless then as you can't run anything you'd want to there
- LargoLasskhyfv 8mo agoBesides the fact it isn't even ready yet, of course you could run everything which runs on NetBSD in there. Just not the ways you're used to. IMO anything which makes NetBSD's base more complete is good. When it is ready, it remains to be seen which external tools may be ported to make use of the newly available internals. If ever.
- __patchbit__ 8mo agoThat some other name: 'cells' (or 'tiles'), in the compositional sense of leaf and tree, forest, framework is more inviting for creative work than 'jails'.
- dizhn 8mo agoIt's not a port of FreeBSD jails ?