4 ms·
OK, slowly: The wars are already total for the weaker sides. See Ukraine/Iran. Did not stop the stronger side attacking. You are advocating for no constraints
by don_esteban 8mo ago
OK, slowly:
The wars are already total for the weaker sides. See Ukraine/Iran.
Did not stop the stronger side attacking.
You are advocating for no constraints (total war) on the stronger side. Taken literally, that means genocide of the losers. Really, that's what you want?
But yes, you are right, the world would be much simpler in such case - there will be no humans left. OK, maybe some hunter-gatherers.
- thaumasiotes 8mo ago> You are advocating for no constraints (total war) on the stronger side. Taken literally, that means genocide of the losers. Really, that's what you want? Taken literally, it means genocide of the losers is an option the winning side has. It always has been. Note that Genghis Khan's explicit plan when he conquered China was to wipe out the Chinese to make room for Mongols. He wasn't stopped from doing that; there was no constraint to block him. But he was persuaded not to.