3 ms·
And "lazy". Claude makes me mad: even when I ask for small code snippets to be improved, it increasingly starts to comment "what I could improve" in the code I
by GuestFAUniverse 8mo ago
And "lazy".
Claude makes me mad:
even when I ask for small code snippets to be improved, it increasingly starts to comment "what I could improve" in the code I stead of generating the embarrassingly easy code with the improvement itself.
If I point it to that by something like "include that yourself", it does a decent job.
That's so _L_azy.
- emsign 8mo agoLLMs are cheaters because their goal isn't to produce good code but to please the human.
- js8 8mo agoThat's a problem with any self-improving tools, not just LLMs. Successful self-improvement leads to efficiency, which is just another name for laziness.
- astrange 8mo agoYou can see what Claude's goal is, and it's not that. https://www.anthropic.com/constitution https://www.anthropic.com/constitution > Anthropic wants Claude to be genuinely helpful to the people it works with or on behalf of, as well as to society, while avoiding actions that are unsafe, unethical, or deceptive.
- gck1 8mo agoEnforce this with deterministic guardrails. Use strictest linting config you possibly can, and even have it write custom, domain specific linters of things that can't happen. Then you won't have to hand hold it that much