3 ms·
> Choosing Grok would be bad for the US They chose Grok and OpenAI. The story was drowned out by the Anthropic controversy, but an xAI deal was signed the sam
by hedora 8mo ago
> Choosing Grok would be bad for the US
They chose Grok and OpenAI. The story was drowned out by the Anthropic controversy, but an xAI deal was signed the same week.
- xvector 8mo agoThey "chose Grok" for political optics, but they don't seriously intend to use it because it's actually just benchmaxxed garbage - hence why they worked with OpenAI.
- dolphinscorpion 8mo agoGrok is chosen because Musk spent $250+ million to elect Trump and is expected to underwrite the 2026 elections. Also, a lot of Trumps and their friends are invested in SpaceX. So they give them money too, but use OpenAI or Claude. I have a feeling that the military likes Claude more
- thegreatpeter 8mo agoDidn’t they choose Anthropic first and then all of this happened so they were forced to go with Grok? Not adding up
- sigwinch 8mo agoWe must conclude that they’re wary of Grok. Maybe it’s the incentive for bias and sabotage.
- scottyah 8mo agoAlso I imagine this is partly due to intra-military power struggles. I'm sure there are a lot in the DoW who like Anthropic- models wise and all that they stand for. The supply chain thing was a way to take the power from them, though petty. Pete is also facing a lot of risk from AI, power structures will be forced to change once a few teams can take over entire departments of people. The military ecosystem is very much like the private sector in where the number of butts in seats is a metric for people. The dynamics will be changed if your group can just hand-roll what they relied on others for.