4 ms·

Dario's full memo - https://pasteboard.co/4Qlmsorrytlk.jpg https://pasteboard.co/4Qlmsorrytlk.jpg

tkgally 8mo ago
Thanks for posting that link. Interesting reading, especially the closing: “I think this attempted spin/gaslighting is not working very well on the general public or the media, where people mostly see OpenAI’s deal with DoW as sketchy or suspicious, and see us as the heroes.... It is working on some Twitter morons, which doesn’t matter, but my main worry is how to make sure it doesn’t work on OpenAI employees. Due to selection effects, they’re sort of a gullible bunch, but it seems important to push back on these narratives which Sam is peddling to his employees.”
deleted 8mo ago
[deleted]
sgustard 8mo ago
Here's the extracted text https://pastebin.com/LS2LpLZ7 https://pastebin.com/LS2LpLZ7
- cousin_it 8mo ago
  Did you use AI to extract the text? It rephrased the text along the way, I'm too lazy to point out all the differences, but if you for example search for the word "suspicious" (which is in the image but not in the extracted text) you should start to get suspicious yourself.
blueblisters 8mo ago
Wow. Surprising to see open hostilities between the leaders of the big ai labs. The differences appear to not just be competitive but also ideological. Edit: Also openly calling OpenAI employees "gullible" and "twitter morons" seems sub-optimal if you like that talent to work for you at some point. Example - https://x.com/tszzl/status/2029334980481212820 https://x.com/tszzl/status/2029334980481212820
- fatata123 8mo ago
  [dead]
- utopiah 8mo ago
  > if you like that talent to work for you at some point. They might not if they think everybody who stayed after Sam Altman was reinstated might be excellent technically speaking yet not have the culture they want, which seems to be the case with all the recent communication.
- sinity 8mo ago
  Twitter morons wasn't referring to OpenAI employees, I think.

Thanks for posting that link. Interesting reading, especially the closing: “I think this attempted spin/gaslighting is not working very well on the general public or the media, where people mostly see OpenAI’s deal with DoW as sketchy or suspicious, and see us as the heroes.... It is working on some Twitter morons, which doesn’t matter, but my main worry is how to make sure it doesn’t work on OpenAI employees. Due to selection effects, they’re sort of a gullible bunch, but it seems important to push back on these narratives which Sam is peddling to his employees.”

deleted 8mo ago

[deleted]

sgustard 8mo ago

Here's the extracted text https://pastebin.com/LS2LpLZ7 https://pastebin.com/LS2LpLZ7

cousin_it 8mo ago
Did you use AI to extract the text? It rephrased the text along the way, I'm too lazy to point out all the differences, but if you for example search for the word "suspicious" (which is in the image but not in the extracted text) you should start to get suspicious yourself.

blueblisters 8mo ago

Wow. Surprising to see open hostilities between the leaders of the big ai labs. The differences appear to not just be competitive but also ideological. Edit: Also openly calling OpenAI employees "gullible" and "twitter morons" seems sub-optimal if you like that talent to work for you at some point. Example - https://x.com/tszzl/status/2029334980481212820 https://x.com/tszzl/status/2029334980481212820

fatata123 8mo ago
[dead]
utopiah 8mo ago
> if you like that talent to work for you at some point. They might not if they think everybody who stayed after Sam Altman was reinstated might be excellent technically speaking yet not have the culture they want, which seems to be the case with all the recent communication.
sinity 8mo ago
Twitter morons wasn't referring to OpenAI employees, I think.