It sounds like your point is that people should be willing to give up their privacy in return for the chance of detecting (not preventing) violent crimes. I th

It sounds like your point is that people should be willing to give up their privacy in return for the chance of detecting (not preventing) violent crimes. I think it's also disingenuous (or at best, completely naive) to pretend like harm from Flock and other surveillance is hypothetical/theoretical. Here are just 2 recent examples of REAL harm: https://www.postcrescent.com/story/news/crime/2026/01/12/menasha-officer-cristian-morales-charged-with-misconduct-in-office/88142963007/ https://www.postcrescent.com/story/news/crime/2026/01/12/men... https://kenoshacountyeye.com/2025/12/12/deputy-on-leave-accused-of-misusing-police-databases-to-track-coworker-could-face-firing-and-criminal-charges/ https://kenoshacountyeye.com/2025/12/12/deputy-on-leave-accu... You can guarantee that there are many more that haven't been caught.