3 ms·
Because they already are
by culi 8mo ago
Because they already are
- k33n 8mo agoCan you name just one incident of abuse?
- arcanemachiner 8mo agoEdward Snowden. Everything after that is a no-brainer. Hell, everything after Room 641A is a no-brainer.
- jp191919 8mo agoSnowden, a true American patriot.
- natebc 8mo agohttps://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article291059560.html https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article29105... A Sedgwick, Kansas, police chief used Flock Safety license plate readers to track his ex-girlfriend and her new boyfriend’s vehicles 228 times over four-plus months and used his police vehicle to follow them out of town, according to a city official and a report released this week by the agency that oversees police certifications.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- Zigurd 8mo agoBefore posting that you couldn't Google the Milwaukee cop who got busted for abusing Flock camera access? From just a week ago? If you want an absolute torrent of abuse search for cops running the IDs of their exes. That's why it's dead certain that Flock cameras will be routinely abused.
- k33n 8mo agoSo then we need better access controls, and apparently the people who abuse it to stalk exes and such are already being prosecuted. Doesn’t seem like the technology itself is the core issue here to me.
- pc86 8mo agoThe only way you could have moved this goal post faster is if you had edited your original comment.
- k33n 8mo agoI’m a problem solver.
- lokar 8mo agoPolice in the US very rarely face accountability for misconduct.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- nyc_data_geek1 8mo agoIf a technology, backdoor or capability exists, it's not a question of if it will be abused, but rather when, how, and by whom. Stop being obtuse.
- k33n 8mo agoTechnophobic take tbh
- nyc_data_geek1 8mo agoNo, this is an entirely pragmatic take. Show me where it's not been proven correct. It's in fact an argument in favor of strong encryption, privacy by design, and security by default.
- 8mo ago