4 ms·
I had a similar idea once when answering a Stack Overflow question[0]. [0] https://stackoverflow.com/a/1831841/61938 https://stackoverflow.com/a/1831841/61938
by robertlagrant 7mo ago
I had a similar idea once when answering a Stack Overflow question[0].
[0] https://stackoverflow.com/a/1831841/61938 https://stackoverflow.com/a/1831841/61938
- gorbachev 7mo agoQuoting your comment: "You definitely don't want to hire the person who thinks - bizarrely - that using library functions is a sign of weakness." So true...I've failed interviews, because the interviewee did see using library functions as a sign of weakness.
- LPisGood 7mo agoI think that it was probably a poorly designed question, but surely you could throw the interviewer a bone by giving a custom answer after they reject the library.
- Cthulhu_ 7mo agoI just wish that in those cases the interviewee gives feedback and allows you to rewrite instead of just failing you. I mean in practice nobody writes library functions themselves unless absolutely necessary, but I get that for some positions you have to demonstrate that you can write lower-level code if you have to.
- robertlagrant 7mo agoThank you, although I regret the "bizarrely".
- Cthulhu_ 7mo agoI love how your answer was straight, to the point and leverages existing standards, then scrolled up to the question and had to go through someone else's thorough, multipage response. Full marks to both answers!
- philipallstar 7mo agoI do absolutely love the other answer!