I'm more taken by the strength of "you can't patent AI ideas" than the IPR of artwork. I get that there are far more creatives than patenters, so I am making a

I'm more taken by the strength of "you can't patent AI ideas" than the IPR of artwork. I get that there are far more creatives than patenters, so I am making a somewhat unfortunate choice here, but to me thats much more significant. The inverse proposition however may hold: AI derived proofs may PREVENT a patent because they didn't declare AI can't make prior art. I'd love to know if that does apply.