5 ms·
The results seem plausible, but it's worth noting that the source of their data (Ahrefs) is just a rough estimate. Given that every publication they examined -
by nerevarthelame 7mo ago
The results seem plausible, but it's worth noting that the source of their data (Ahrefs) is just a rough estimate. Given that every publication they examined - including several outside of the tech industry - showed declines, I'd hope they would confirm that it's not an artifact of the estimation process. Ahrefs themselves caution against using their data to make these sorts of conclusions:
>While these estimates don’t, and can’t, show you exactly how much organic traffic a website gets, they work incredibly well for comparison. For example, it’s fantastic for learning if your competitors’ websites get more or less organic search traffic than your own.
(https://help.ahrefs.com/en/articles/1863206-what-is-organic-traffic-in-ahrefs-and-how-do-we-calculate-it https://help.ahrefs.com/en/articles/1863206-what-is-organic-...)
- nprateem 7mo agoConde nast reported in the last few days their Web traffic is massively down too. Other big publishers have reported it themselves too. The web and SEO are dead.
- onetokeoverthe 7mo ago[dead]