4 ms·
I was using a common "phrase" that highlights individual human error vs systemic failures Since you are stuck on the semantics allow me to rephrase - "if a sin
by noboostforyou 7mo ago
I was using a common "phrase" that highlights individual human error vs systemic failures
Since you are stuck on the semantics allow me to rephrase - "if a single developer is able to delete your entire production db, that's an org failure"
- mikkupikku 7mo agoSpecifying a junior dev on his first day is a plain deliberate rhetorical ploy to frame systemic blame as more legitimate than individual blame. If not, then why not make it a senior developer? Anybody can fuck something up, but we give special consideration to noobs who make noob mistakes, and that's what is being implicitly appealed to, illegitimately. This journalist wasn't a noob, and using ChatGPT to write his article was an error in judgement but not an actual mistake.
- newswasboring 7mo agoThe original author clarified and you are still stuck here? Take a step back dude it's not that serious.
- mikkupikku 7mo ago"You disagree with me? Whoa dude, you need to relax and touch grass."
- newswasboring 7mo agoThings are more nuanced than agreeing and disagreeing. If you can't see that then...
- mikkupikku 7mo agoI disagree with you, deal with it. Specifying a junior developer to make the point of blaming systems instead of individuals, to absolve a journalist of individual blame for fabricating quotes, is flat out bullshit and you're wrong to try weaselling it. Inb4 Omg I still can't believe you're disagreeing with me, like yikes dude go outside. Auroiris is right, it's a Motte and Bailey routine. And it's insulting that you're pretending otherwise.