4 ms·
Interesting. This is clearly a big CPU change if so. I wonder why no E cores. I’m sure E cores would be more efficient at OS tasks than the new performance core
by aurareturn 8mo ago
Interesting. This is clearly a big CPU change if so. I wonder why no E cores. I’m sure E cores would be more efficient at OS tasks than the new performance cores.
For example, 6 super, 8 performance, and 4 efficiency.
- NetMageSCW 8mo agoAnother commenter stated the P cores can be scaled down to be E cores dynamically, so why not?
- aurareturn 8mo agoP cores would take up more die space.
- bombcar 8mo agoI wonder if they'll get to good enough scaling from E to Super where they don't really need to distinguish anymore?
- Choco31415 8mo agoThere's still a difference when it comes to die size and transistor counts dedicated between the two core types.