4 ms·

> we are talking depictions of incest We aren't talking about depictions of incest either. There is no relation between step-siblings/parents/etc. And in these

> we are talking depictions of incest We aren't talking about depictions of incest either. There is no relation between step-siblings/parents/etc. And in these videos, every single person is unrelated to every other person even in the depictions. The step-child has both a step-mom and step-dad... Where I come from, that would be an adoption? I would guess the next form of these videos will be adoption porn.

benj111 7mo ago
Well ok there are a variety of issues going on. I assumed it was 'step' relative inorder to stop it being incest, and that it's basically a wink to the audience without changing the 'script'. Personally I don't think changing the title is morally relevant so it doesn't matter to me what precise relation the script and title uses. Which takes us back to depiction, they're all actors so what ever the laws are, it doesn't matter. Or shouldn't.
nephihaha 7mo ago
Incest isn't just about your genes. It's pretty dubious to get sexually involved with your adopted children if they are old enough. The "step" thing is a get out clause. In the Netherlands, I've seen stuff advertised which doesn't even bother with that.
- swat535 7mo ago
  If you're arguing from a moral perspective it is subjective. You can also morally object to people drinking coffee. Adult incest is opposed mainly due to genetic risks in offspring and blood relation issues. Otherwise, consenting adults should be free to do as they please. If the "stepdad" and "stepdaughter" met as strangers, you wouldn’t care.
  - nephihaha 7mo ago
    You think incest is about inbreeding. It isn't just that. If you take that line to its logical extreme, then that means that it is okay if contraception is used or if same sex relations are involved. I don't think it's healthy for fathers and adult sons to be having sex with each other, for example. Or that any of this becomes okay when a daughter turns eighteen (or whatever it is in your jurisdiction) and her father wears a condom. That is psychologically and socially unhealthy. Nothing to do with inbreeding. If a school teacher repeatedly had sex with pupils a day after they left school (and were legal adults), that would raise numerous ethical issues. Consent isn't some kind of carte blanche or moral justification.
    - jermaustin1 7mo ago
      But no one is talking about actual incest, they are talking about a cheap storyline in a stupid online video made by consenting adults pretending (and actually) not related by blood. If you have a moral objection to the content of the video, don't watch it, if you don't want to let people consume media that has objectionable themes, let's ban all violence as well, not just in porn, but movies, music, literature. No more Jason Statham, no more Daniel Craig, no more Dwayne 'the Rock' Johnson, no more Marky Mark, no more Eminem, no more Homer (sex and violence), no more The Bible (sex, incest, violence, rape, genocide, polygamy, slavery, child sacrifice). "Step-cest" - a term I am sure has existed before, but I'm claiming it now, is make believe. And I'd bet 90+% of the watchers have it on mute.
      - nephihaha 7mo ago
        [dead]

benj111 7mo ago

Well ok there are a variety of issues going on. I assumed it was 'step' relative inorder to stop it being incest, and that it's basically a wink to the audience without changing the 'script'. Personally I don't think changing the title is morally relevant so it doesn't matter to me what precise relation the script and title uses. Which takes us back to depiction, they're all actors so what ever the laws are, it doesn't matter. Or shouldn't.

nephihaha 7mo ago

Incest isn't just about your genes. It's pretty dubious to get sexually involved with your adopted children if they are old enough. The "step" thing is a get out clause. In the Netherlands, I've seen stuff advertised which doesn't even bother with that.

swat535 7mo ago
If you're arguing from a moral perspective it is subjective. You can also morally object to people drinking coffee. Adult incest is opposed mainly due to genetic risks in offspring and blood relation issues. Otherwise, consenting adults should be free to do as they please. If the "stepdad" and "stepdaughter" met as strangers, you wouldn’t care.
- nephihaha 7mo ago
  You think incest is about inbreeding. It isn't just that. If you take that line to its logical extreme, then that means that it is okay if contraception is used or if same sex relations are involved. I don't think it's healthy for fathers and adult sons to be having sex with each other, for example. Or that any of this becomes okay when a daughter turns eighteen (or whatever it is in your jurisdiction) and her father wears a condom. That is psychologically and socially unhealthy. Nothing to do with inbreeding. If a school teacher repeatedly had sex with pupils a day after they left school (and were legal adults), that would raise numerous ethical issues. Consent isn't some kind of carte blanche or moral justification.
  - jermaustin1 7mo ago
    But no one is talking about actual incest, they are talking about a cheap storyline in a stupid online video made by consenting adults pretending (and actually) not related by blood. If you have a moral objection to the content of the video, don't watch it, if you don't want to let people consume media that has objectionable themes, let's ban all violence as well, not just in porn, but movies, music, literature. No more Jason Statham, no more Daniel Craig, no more Dwayne 'the Rock' Johnson, no more Marky Mark, no more Eminem, no more Homer (sex and violence), no more The Bible (sex, incest, violence, rape, genocide, polygamy, slavery, child sacrifice). "Step-cest" - a term I am sure has existed before, but I'm claiming it now, is make believe. And I'd bet 90+% of the watchers have it on mute.
    - nephihaha 7mo ago
      [dead]