> In this case, it feels natural to me that the line for images should be aligned with the line for the act itself. Why? Things are made illegal because someon

> In this case, it feels natural to me that the line for images should be aligned with the line for the act itself. Why? Things are made illegal because someone involved is (presumed to be) harmed. That assumption doesn't hold if everyone involved was hired to pretend for the camera, or at least not in the same way. Maybe ban the movie industry as a whole over it's reputation for chewing people up?