4 ms·
This all seems to be a theatre, because most actors participating in "step sister" kind of porn aren't actually step-relatives. The same with "teacher-student"
by maratc 8mo ago
This all seems to be a theatre, because most actors participating in "step sister" kind of porn aren't actually step-relatives. The same with "teacher-student" porn: the actors mostly are neither teachers nor students. I suspect it's the same with "husband and wife" videos, too.
The idea of this, as far as I understand, is to make some fantasies illegal.
- nephihaha 8mo agoIt's simulating incest since they can't do it without the step- prefix.
- andy_ppp 8mo agoI presume Tom and Jerry should also be banned for the horrifying violence they show children...
- edgyquant 8mo agoOne of these is a cartoon the other is two people having sex on camera. Try to be a little more honest here
- maratc 8mo agoIn your opinion, a totally realistic AI-generated porn should be treated more like "cartoon" or like "two people having sex on camera"?
- edgyquant 8mo ago[flagged]
- andy_ppp 8mo agoWhat are you talking about? Nobody said that!
- boesboes 8mo agoDude, you are the ONLY one here talking about children consuming porn, you depraved pervert!
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- benj111 8mo agoYou're being very disingenous. Tom and Jerry depicts 2 beings assaulting each other which is bad. Porn in this case depicts near incest also bad. You could say tom and jerry is worse because that's aimed at kids, where as porn is aimed at adults who we tend to trust to tell fantasy from reality. The comparison was then moved forward to ai porn. That has no real people. So is that bad? It's a legitimate question. This isn't about reality, it's about depiction. Real people depicting a thing crosses the line. A cartoon depiction does not. Where does ai stand. But as we all know, the line is one is violence where as one is sex, and you appear to think that it's worse to depict a normal consensual act than depict violence or murder.
- wongarsu 8mo agoBetter example then: I assume the TV series 24 will be banned for glorified depictions of torture and violence. Real actors portraying torture as an effective investigation method for high-stakes anti-terror investigations, despite being illegal both in the setting and in real life
- andy_ppp 8mo agoAmazing that someone here understood what I was saying with perfect clarity, I was really struggling to believe that the parent did not understand.
- benj111 8mo agoSo a cartoon depicting incest would be ok?
- croes 8mo agoSo it‘s not simulated incest.
- maratc 8mo agoNot an expert but my uninformed assumption would be that there's simply more demand for "step-sibling" porn than there is for "sibling" porn.
- Mashimo 8mo agoNo, I think it's because of VISA / Mastercard. They have a list of what kind of porn you can sell.
- ethanrutherford 8mo agoThe number one porn site on the internet does not take a credit card to access.
- wongarsu 8mo agoDon't they have an ad-free premium version you can pay for via credit card?
- wavemode 8mo agoThere probably isn't. But actual incest is risky and (often) illegal, therefore lots of porn sites disallow videos depicting it, therefore producers avoid it.
- water-data-dude 8mo agoSo what? I honestly don't get the issue. It's pretend. When sex is taboo our brains will often associate the two things and we end up enjoying the taboo-ness. Incest is a big taboo, so it's sex with extra taboo slathered on it. People will want to fantasize about it. It's how brains work. As long as it's in the realm of fantasy I don't think there's ANY issue. I'll go further and say that if two consenting adult sibling want to have sex it shouldn't be anyone's business but their own. It's not the state's job to decide that they aren't allowed because it makes the rest of us uncomfortable.