4 ms·
Thanks for the link! Some very pretty stuff there. Missing AFAICT are categorical string diagrams. I'm only sort-of familiar with the notation for Haskell Arro
by discarded1023 7mo ago
Thanks for the link! Some very pretty stuff there.
Missing AFAICT are categorical string diagrams. I'm only sort-of familiar with the notation for Haskell Arrows [1,2] but a quick google for "lambda calculus string diagrams" turns up some recent work by Dan Ghica and others that may be of interest.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_diagram https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_diagram
[2] Ross Paterson "A New Notation for Arrows" (2001)
- bntr 7mo agoThanks! I liked the pics here: https://piedeleu.com/posts/diagrammatic-lambda-calculus/ https://piedeleu.com/posts/diagrammatic-lambda-calculus/ I'd love to see them smoothly animated.