Wow. This is the first take on AI that I find really shocking, and it is totally believable. But worth noting the difference between a system you interact with

Wow. This is the first take on AI that I find really shocking, and it is totally believable. But worth noting the difference between a system you interact with and a visualization of such system, injected into your eyeball, is the lack of secondary effects (or first effects?). I suppose those can ALSO be faked and maintained, but at some point the illusion is more work than the system that would normally create it. It seems likely that the fake system would be much more work than the code needed to generate it for most modern uses, but when we are spinning up bespoke code that will be run once, for a single user? The fake output might be more efficient. I don't think this means this is the future. But it certainly means it could become a preferred approach for certain use cases, when there is no need for reuse. I love finding ideas like this, ehich feel like true "AI-native" thinking.