5 ms·
> But the reasoning for that was a preference for DST. There was no reasoning for the Dubya alteration: the change was not debated anywhere, and (AIUI) no one
by throw0101c 8mo ago
> But the reasoning for that was a preference for DST.
There was no reasoning for the Dubya alteration: the change was not debated anywhere, and (AIUI) no one was ever able to figure out how it actually got slipped into the legislation.
- wvenable 8mo agoThe DST extension was included in Section 110 of the 2005 Energy Policy Act, debated as part of the bill, and justified on energy-savings grounds. Congress even required the Department of Energy to study its impact afterwards!