4 ms·
I'd love to have a smaller/cheaper phone but I continue to hold onto my Pro from a couple years ago is for the high end camera, particularly the telephoto lens.
by giwook 8mo ago
I'd love to have a smaller/cheaper phone but I continue to hold onto my Pro from a couple years ago is for the high end camera, particularly the telephoto lens.
No, I don't need it all the time.
But when you do need it, it's invaluable.
- gs17 8mo agoI have the same issue with my Pixel. It's nice to be able to use a real zoom when I need it, but that means I can't get the one that's otherwise what I really need.
- rootusrootus 8mo agoWhat I would like is a really good single camera. If that's even possible. One thing I find sort of irritating about the multi-camera setup on my iPhone is that using it as a magnifier is often frustrating. Get too close to something and it decides to switch cameras, which then means now you're actually looking at something else entirely. Maybe I'm missing a setting somewhere, I can't be the only person to notice how awkwardly the functionality is implemented.
- redundantly 8mo agoIf they added a lens lock option (like the AE lock) it would fix this problem nicely.
- esperent 8mo agoThe latest Xiaomi has this, they call it continuous optical zoom. It's the first time I've seen it on a phone camera.
- csomar 8mo agoNo, it sucks (16 Pro). I've had lots of issues reading QR codes.
- giwook 7mo agoIt's hard to get that in a single camera because of the size. If you consider the size of professional grade camera lenses there's a reason why they produce much better images. But conversely it's pretty impressive what phone manufacturers have been able to accomplish with such a small amount of space. For 90% of use cases camera phones are sufficient.
- derencius 8mo agosame for me. the quality of photos with my 15 max is great compared to newer and simpler models. waiting to upgrade to a 18 max when available. and I have a nice portable camera (ricoh gr 3) collecting dust.