2 ms·
You quote a section about unpublished work. The painting was published nearly a hundred years ago so the quote isn't relevant. If you think the article is wro
by masfuerte 8mo ago
You quote a section about unpublished work. The painting was published nearly a hundred years ago so the quote isn't relevant. If you think the article is wrong please state how.
- Someone 8mo agoI don’t see that. “For works published or registered before 1978, the maximum copyright duration is 95 years from the date of publication, if copyright was renewed during the 28th year following publication” may not apply here, but if so, it isn’t because the work was published.
- masfuerte 8mo agoIs this a guessing game? Which specific claim in the article do you think is wrong? What do you think is the true situation?