3 ms·
based on your comment (the site is unresponsive, so I cannot check what exactly it says) I think the article is incorrect. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyri
by Someone 8mo ago
based on your comment (the site is unresponsive, so I cannot check what exactly it says) I think the article is incorrect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_law_of_the_United_States#Works_created_before_1978 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_law_of_the_United_St...:
“For works published or registered before 1978, the maximum copyright duration is 95 years from the date of publication, if copyright was renewed during the 28th year following publication. Copyright renewal has been automatic since the Copyright Renewal Act of 1992.
For works created before 1978, but not published or registered before 1978, the standard §302 copyright duration of 70 years from the author's death also applies. Prior to 1978, works had to be published or registered to receive copyright protection. Upon the effective date of the 1976 Copyright Act (which was January 1, 1978) this requirement was removed and these unpublished, unregistered works received protection. However, Congress intended to provide an incentive for these authors to publish their unpublished works. To provide that incentive, these works, if published before 2003, would not have their protection expire before 2048.”
- masfuerte 8mo agoYou quote a section about unpublished work. The painting was published nearly a hundred years ago so the quote isn't relevant. If you think the article is wrong please state how.
- Someone 8mo agoI don’t see that. “For works published or registered before 1978, the maximum copyright duration is 95 years from the date of publication, if copyright was renewed during the 28th year following publication” may not apply here, but if so, it isn’t because the work was published.
- masfuerte 8mo agoIs this a guessing game? Which specific claim in the article do you think is wrong? What do you think is the true situation?
- bonzini 8mo agoThe article is about the Mondrian estate picking and choosing between the 95 year, life+70, and life+80 rules—and being wrong in all three cases. So I wasn't doing a legal analysis of which rule is the correct one, but rather observing how their arguments are ridiculous.