5 ms·

Well, actually yes they did contribute to the attack on the Republic. See[1]. [1] : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c20l1v0ldqzo https://www.bbc.co.uk/news

Well, actually yes they did contribute to the attack on the Republic. See[1]. [1] : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c20l1v0ldqzo https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c20l1v0ldqzo

breppp 7mo ago
Your link actually says they were contributing to the defense not the attack > The US-Israeli strikes were launched after negotiations to limit Iran's nuclear programme ended without a deal. The UK did not participate.
- derelicta 7mo ago
  Yes that is true. The UK contributes to the defense operations of the imperial aggressors against the Republic.
  - breppp 7mo ago
    What's your view on the Republic's imperial aggression against Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen?
    - derelicta 7mo ago
      Which Republic are we talking about? The Islamic Republic or the western "republics"?
      - breppp 7mo ago
        I am talking about the Islamic Republic setting up local mercenary forces in order to extract resources from the local government in Iraq and Lebanon. That's called Imperialism and was common among european powers in the 19th century
        derelicta 7mo ago
        [flagged]
        breppp 7mo ago
        Citizen armies? You haven't talked to a Lebanese lately haven't you?
        vintermann 7mo ago
        Good thing they stopped with that, eh?
        Covenant0028 7mo ago
        > in order to extract resources from the local government in Iraq and Lebanon. How evil of them to do that. They should have known only the United States of America has the divine right to invade countries and extract their resources. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4grxzxjjd8o https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4grxzxjjd8o > That's called Imperialism and was common among european powers in the 19th century Fortunately, the USA does not want to revive such practices, as they indicated in this speech: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/marco-rubio-munich-trump-european-allies.html https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/marco-rubio-munich-t...
        breppp 7mo ago
        > How evil of them to do that. They should have known only the United States of America has the divine right to invade countries and extract their resources Yes, OP was already saying Iran is free to act because the US is an imperial power. I was merely stating that he is conveniently ignoring Iran's imperialist behavior
        derelicta 7mo ago
        Equating Iran's struggle against a genocide in Palestine with Imperialism is misinformed at best, criminal at worst. Either way, only a zionist could say that, which makes this conversation completely useless.
- C6JEsQeQa5fCjE 7mo ago
  > The US-Israeli strikes were launched after negotiations to limit Iran's nuclear programme ended without a deal. The UK did not participate. The negotiations didn't end without a deal, they were ongoing but not finalized. The next session of the negotiations was scheduled for Monday. And then, Israel and US simply attacked on Saturday. It is very important to use precise language so as to not downplay the illegal aggression against Iran.
  - breppp 7mo ago
    Take the language issue with the BBC, which is hardly for this war In any case a contrarian opinion might be that Iran promised to yield on negotiations following the previous war as mentioned here: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-asks-gulf-arab-states-have-trump-press-israel-immediate-ceasefire-sources-2025-06-16/ https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-asks-gulf-ara... And Iran instead opted for their years old tactic of stalling the negotiations

Well, actually yes they did contribute to the attack on the Republic. See[1]. [1] : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c20l1v0ldqzo https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c20l1v0ldqzo

breppp 7mo ago

Your link actually says they were contributing to the defense not the attack > The US-Israeli strikes were launched after negotiations to limit Iran's nuclear programme ended without a deal. The UK did not participate.

derelicta 7mo ago
Yes that is true. The UK contributes to the defense operations of the imperial aggressors against the Republic.
- breppp 7mo ago
  What's your view on the Republic's imperial aggression against Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen?
  - derelicta 7mo ago
    Which Republic are we talking about? The Islamic Republic or the western "republics"?
    - breppp 7mo ago
      I am talking about the Islamic Republic setting up local mercenary forces in order to extract resources from the local government in Iraq and Lebanon. That's called Imperialism and was common among european powers in the 19th century
      - derelicta 7mo ago
        [flagged]
        breppp 7mo ago
        Citizen armies? You haven't talked to a Lebanese lately haven't you?
      - vintermann 7mo ago
        Good thing they stopped with that, eh?
      - Covenant0028 7mo ago
        > in order to extract resources from the local government in Iraq and Lebanon. How evil of them to do that. They should have known only the United States of America has the divine right to invade countries and extract their resources. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4grxzxjjd8o https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4grxzxjjd8o > That's called Imperialism and was common among european powers in the 19th century Fortunately, the USA does not want to revive such practices, as they indicated in this speech: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/marco-rubio-munich-trump-european-allies.html https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/marco-rubio-munich-t...
        breppp 7mo ago
        > How evil of them to do that. They should have known only the United States of America has the divine right to invade countries and extract their resources Yes, OP was already saying Iran is free to act because the US is an imperial power. I was merely stating that he is conveniently ignoring Iran's imperialist behavior
        derelicta 7mo ago
        Equating Iran's struggle against a genocide in Palestine with Imperialism is misinformed at best, criminal at worst. Either way, only a zionist could say that, which makes this conversation completely useless.
C6JEsQeQa5fCjE 7mo ago
> The US-Israeli strikes were launched after negotiations to limit Iran's nuclear programme ended without a deal. The UK did not participate. The negotiations didn't end without a deal, they were ongoing but not finalized. The next session of the negotiations was scheduled for Monday. And then, Israel and US simply attacked on Saturday. It is very important to use precise language so as to not downplay the illegal aggression against Iran.
- breppp 7mo ago
  Take the language issue with the BBC, which is hardly for this war In any case a contrarian opinion might be that Iran promised to yield on negotiations following the previous war as mentioned here: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-asks-gulf-arab-states-have-trump-press-israel-immediate-ceasefire-sources-2025-06-16/ https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-asks-gulf-ara... And Iran instead opted for their years old tactic of stalling the negotiations