3 ms·
you're right. there are a couple explanations that might have some merit looking at it from the device perspective. one is the the underlying block size is real
by convolvatron 8mo ago
you're right. there are a couple explanations that might have some merit looking at it from the device perspective. one is the the underlying block size is really large, so that looks like a very large cache line that a sequential scan will always hit. its also very likely that there are prefetchers running to try and hide the latency.