While I agree with the thrust of the article: It would help if the article itself wasn't clearly at least partially LLM written. It has many of the shibboleths:

While I agree with the thrust of the article: It would help if the article itself wasn't clearly at least partially LLM written. It has many of the shibboleths: "This is not a minor adjustment. It is a fundamental shift in professional identity. " "That is not empowerment. That is scope creep without a corresponding increase in compensation" Honestly, it's lazy. At least edit the bloody thing.