4 ms·
That's the literal definition of stagnation. That is not compatible with growth. Also that's not a new idea, that "everything worth inventing/exploring has alr
by pluc 8mo ago
That's the literal definition of stagnation. That is not compatible with growth.
Also that's not a new idea, that "everything worth inventing/exploring has already been". It's precisely what AI reinforces, and that goes against human nature (and capitalism) as that statement has historically proved.
- skeledrew 7mo agoOh no, there will always be things that're still worth inventing/exploring. They're just very few, and a tiny subset of that few will be applicable to today's businesses.