4 ms·
Reminder that AI-writing detection tools are largely junk.
by phyzome 8mo ago
Reminder that AI-writing detection tools are largely junk.
- 383toast 8mo agoNote Pangram is not like the others and has heavy academic research on statistical method soundness
- lelanthran 8mo ago> Reminder that AI-writing detection tools are largely junk. In what way? False positives or false negatives?
- jatins 8mo agoPangram is reliable. Quoting from their website > Pangram achieves essentially zero false positive rates and false negative rates on medium-length to long passages.
- phyzome 8mo agoWell, with such a trustworthy source, I have to believe it.