4 ms·

The post itself is 100% AI written https://www.pangram.com/history/6572a5c4-f548-46e2-977d-9813e4a052e1?ucc=PQCmbwNZf1k https://www.pangram.com/history/6572a5c4

by jatins 8mo ago

The post itself is 100% AI written https://www.pangram.com/history/6572a5c4-f548-46e2-977d-9813e4a052e1?ucc=PQCmbwNZf1k https://www.pangram.com/history/6572a5c4-f548-46e2-977d-9813...

phyzome 8mo ago
Reminder that AI-writing detection tools are largely junk.
- 383toast 8mo ago
  Note Pangram is not like the others and has heavy academic research on statistical method soundness
- lelanthran 8mo ago
  > Reminder that AI-writing detection tools are largely junk. In what way? False positives or false negatives?
- jatins 8mo ago
  Pangram is reliable. Quoting from their website > Pangram achieves essentially zero false positive rates and false negative rates on medium-length to long passages.
  - phyzome 8mo ago
    Well, with such a trustworthy source, I have to believe it.
383toast 8mo ago
Ironic