4 ms·

Hey Anthropic, how about you use AGENTS.md for one thing.

by brikym 8mo ago

deaux 8mo ago
Now that would make it easier for Codex users to switch indeed! This seems like the best timing for it they're ever gonna get, and worth the ultra tiny loss of marketing value their "CLAUDE.md" naming provides. For the Anthropic employees here reading along, pitch it to whoever has kept blocking this, because you need to get the most out of this opportunity here.
2001zhaozhao 8mo ago
Just make a symlink of CLAUDE.md -> AGENTS.md I have seen quite a few open source projects do this. It works quite well. Another alternative is to create CLAUDE.md with the exact contents: "@AGENTS.md"
- deaux 8mo ago
  Big projects should have a lot of nested AGENTS.md files, it's inconvenient and they simply need to add support for the universal standard as everyone else has done rather than being a weird holdout like IE6.
- brikym 8mo ago
  We all know it's easy... so why don't Anthropic do it. Seems rather petty insisting their users put advertising in their repo or someone else's repo.
silverwind 8mo ago
+1, https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/6235 https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/6235 is probably the most upvoted github issue that i've seen.
Sammi 8mo ago
Before this week I was sure Anthropic were actually just as soulless as OpenAi, just because they don't support open standards like AGENTS.md and /.agents/skills. They can so easily win the support of the open source crowd if they just support open standards like these. The /.agents/skills issue for claude code is here: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/16345 https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/16345 Their automatic close bot will close it soon as it's been three weeks since the last comment.
- cma 8mo ago
  Why not just symlink
  - Sammi 8mo ago
    Why not just use a lightning to usb-c adapter? Because proprietary interfaces are for building monopolies and standards are for breaking them.
Handy-Man 8mo ago
Why would they? They were first with CLAUDE.md. Others could have adopted to that if they wanted. Don’t see a reason for Claude to change their approach.
- kelnos 8mo ago
  Being a good citizen of the commons means not hard-coding things specific about your product as a standard. ChatGPT or Gemini using a file called "CLAUDE" doesn't make sense. The first mover doesn't just automatically win.
tomComb 8mo ago
I felt that way too, until I noticed how different their schemes are for discovering these files, e.g. Claude will pick up context files in parent folders, and Codex doesn’t. Maybe it’s better that they maintain different names to prevent people from assuming that they work the same
deleted 8mo ago
[deleted]

Hey Anthropic, how about you use AGENTS.md for one thing.

by brikym 8mo ago

Hey Anthropic, how about you use AGENTS.md for one thing.

deaux 8mo ago

Now that would make it easier for Codex users to switch indeed! This seems like the best timing for it they're ever gonna get, and worth the ultra tiny loss of marketing value their "CLAUDE.md" naming provides. For the Anthropic employees here reading along, pitch it to whoever has kept blocking this, because you need to get the most out of this opportunity here.

2001zhaozhao 8mo ago

Just make a symlink of CLAUDE.md -> AGENTS.md I have seen quite a few open source projects do this. It works quite well. Another alternative is to create CLAUDE.md with the exact contents: "@AGENTS.md"

deaux 8mo ago
Big projects should have a lot of nested AGENTS.md files, it's inconvenient and they simply need to add support for the universal standard as everyone else has done rather than being a weird holdout like IE6.
brikym 8mo ago
We all know it's easy... so why don't Anthropic do it. Seems rather petty insisting their users put advertising in their repo or someone else's repo.

silverwind 8mo ago

+1, https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/6235 https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/6235 is probably the most upvoted github issue that i've seen.

Sammi 8mo ago

Before this week I was sure Anthropic were actually just as soulless as OpenAi, just because they don't support open standards like AGENTS.md and /.agents/skills. They can so easily win the support of the open source crowd if they just support open standards like these. The /.agents/skills issue for claude code is here: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/16345 https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/16345 Their automatic close bot will close it soon as it's been three weeks since the last comment.

cma 8mo ago
Why not just symlink
- Sammi 8mo ago
  Why not just use a lightning to usb-c adapter? Because proprietary interfaces are for building monopolies and standards are for breaking them.

Handy-Man 8mo ago

Why would they? They were first with CLAUDE.md. Others could have adopted to that if they wanted. Don’t see a reason for Claude to change their approach.

kelnos 8mo ago
Being a good citizen of the commons means not hard-coding things specific about your product as a standard. ChatGPT or Gemini using a file called "CLAUDE" doesn't make sense. The first mover doesn't just automatically win.

tomComb 8mo ago

I felt that way too, until I noticed how different their schemes are for discovering these files, e.g. Claude will pick up context files in parent folders, and Codex doesn’t. Maybe it’s better that they maintain different names to prevent people from assuming that they work the same

deleted 8mo ago

[deleted]