3 ms·
I suppose that people who actively do not want to have kids should not have kids. Their hypothetical kids won't be happy and well-developed, but instead always
by nine_k 8mo ago
I suppose that people who actively do not want to have kids should not have kids. Their hypothetical kids won't be happy and well-developed, but instead always feel that they are an undesired burden.
Instead, people who like having kids should have more kids. This would proliferate a healthy culture that sees kids as a source of happiness, not a burden of misery taken out of necessity.
- AnthonyMouse 8mo ago> Instead, people who like having kids should have more kids. To make this work you need some kind of cross-subsidy (e.g. large child tax credit), because having a larger number of kids requires the means as well as the will and the people willing to do it aren't all billionaires. But then we do essentially the opposite and drive up housing prices when larger families need more house. Higher housing prices are essentially a transfer from young and future families to retirees.
- graemep 8mo agoI am not convinced that is true. Once you actually have kids it changes your outlook too dramatically. Someone who does not want to have kids before they have a kid, will almost certainly love any kid they actually have.
- nunez 8mo agoHaving a look at your state/country's foster care registry and the foster care industry as a whole might change your feelings on that.
- graemep 8mo agoI doubt there is a correlation between kids being wanted before birth and their likelihood of entering foster care. People who do not want kids do nkt have them.
- hirvi74 8mo ago> I suppose that people who actively do not want to have kids should not have kids. I would describe myself as being the converse of that statement. I do not believe my desires should truly have much of a bearing on my situation.
- nine_k 8mo agoThere's an easy and natural way: don't use contraception. This is how it worked for millennia.