4 ms·
I like the idea here, but the final product is just so far from what good interactive articles/explanations actually look like. E.g., this style of article: -
by jazzpush2 7mo ago
I like the idea here, but the final product is just so far from what good interactive articles/explanations actually look like. E.g., this style of article:
- https://mlu-explain.github.io/decision-tree/ https://mlu-explain.github.io/decision-tree/
- any article from distill.pub
- any piece from NYT
- jbdamask 7mo agoThat decision-tree page is killer!
- RagnarD 7mo agoAnd those are all auto-generated?
- jbdamask 7mo agoIf by "auto-generated" you mean, does the LLM generate the output from the input, then yes.
- RagnarD 7mo agoYes, exactly what I mean. Thanks.
- zitrusfrucht 7mo agoOf course they are not. That is the whole point.
- RagnarD 7mo agoThe author confirms that they ARE, so what's your "of course they are not" about? You might have misunderstood my obvious meaning: is the output webpage fully generated without human tweaking just from the paper alone?
- jazzpush2 7mo agoAll of the links I posted were published before ChatGPT, no AI.
- zitrusfrucht 7mo agoYou asked that on a post with examples of data journalism articles which are obviously not AI generated. So when you say ask about „those“ it was clear to me that you meant these examples.
- Lerc 7mo agoIt's about what I thought would be possible. I look forward to things of the calibre of redblobgames, but perhaps no this year.
- xigoi 7mo agoDon’t you dare forget https://ciechanow.ski/ https://ciechanow.ski/
- RationPhantoms 7mo agoThis is an absolute wealth of information about gravitational mechanics but quite a few of the diagrams were so alien to me that they became undecipherable.
- xigoi 7mo agoThere is much more than the one article. Check the archives.
- jazzpush2 7mo agoGood call, I'm sure I've left off a lot of amazing work, and his is certainly top class!