4 ms·

It's such an off timeline, where Israel can commit de facto genocide and there is no nato bombing like there was in Yugoslavia, and the USA, defenders of Ukrain

It's such an off timeline, where Israel can commit de facto genocide and there is no nato bombing like there was in Yugoslavia, and the USA, defenders of Ukraine's sovereignty, kidnap a state's leader and try to murder another state's leader, neither of which were a threat to the USA. The board of peace means nothing, the USA cannot be trusted since it is a lapdog of Israel (did Epstein have something on somebody), and the president of peace starts his own war, hoping to outdo previous presidents in unprovoked murder and destruction. All of the above gives Russia political ammunition to justify its SMO, and encourages China to step up its hopes to bring Taiwan back to the family. And we have been told that AI and climate change are the biggest threats to humanity, ffs.

throwaway3060 8mo ago
The same state's leader that sold to Russia the drones being used to violate Ukraine's sovereignty?
- CrzyLngPwd 8mo ago
  Do you believe that allies shouldn't sell weapons to each other? Do you think people should try to kill the leaders of countries that sell weapons in such circumstances?
  - tim333 8mo ago
    It depends a bit on what they do with the weapons. The Ukraine invasion is a nasty business.
    - CrzyLngPwd 8mo ago
      Do you think the USAs and Israel's unprovoked attack on Iran is a nasty business, or only that Russia's attack on Ukraine is a nasty business? How about NATO attacking Yugoslavia unprovoked? Was that a nasty business? NATO attacking Libya, unprovoked, was that a nasty business? The USA attacking Afghanistan unprovoked, was that a nasty business?
      - throwaway3060 8mo ago
        Going after the monsters that murdered thousands of Americans was entirely justified. Russia's problem is that all their reasons for invading Ukraine, they made up. The very people Russia claims to have been 'saving', are the ones that they are disproportionately killing.
      - _zagj 8mo ago
        > USA attacking Afghanistan unprovoked Unprovoked? This has to be one of the dumbest, most ahistorical bits of tankiespew I've ever read on this site.
  - slowmovintarget 8mo ago
    So the only thing you're actually interested in is arguing "Trump bad." Iran's religious leadership has been sponsoring terror throughout the world for the last 40 years. Jimmy Carter was duped by the British into causing the rise of Shia Islam there. Khamenei and his leadership had escape locations prepared in Venezuela. The U.S. rolled those up first, nabbing the leader of a criminal cartel (Maduro) in the process. Now Israel and the U.S. have taken out Iran's oppressive "supreme leader" at a moment in history when the Iranian people are struggling for their own freedom. Khamenei was a bad guy. Maduro is a bad guy. They've put evil and harm out into the world and you're wringing your hands about it because it was Trump that stopped them? "By G'Quan, I can't recall the last time I was in a fight like that. No moral ambiguity, no .. hopeless battle against ancient and overwhelming forces. They were the bad guys, as you say, we were the good guys. And they made a very satisfying thump when they hit the floor." -- G'Kar
erxam 8mo ago
[flagged]

throwaway3060 8mo ago

The same state's leader that sold to Russia the drones being used to violate Ukraine's sovereignty?

CrzyLngPwd 8mo ago
Do you believe that allies shouldn't sell weapons to each other? Do you think people should try to kill the leaders of countries that sell weapons in such circumstances?
- tim333 8mo ago
  It depends a bit on what they do with the weapons. The Ukraine invasion is a nasty business.
  - CrzyLngPwd 8mo ago
    Do you think the USAs and Israel's unprovoked attack on Iran is a nasty business, or only that Russia's attack on Ukraine is a nasty business? How about NATO attacking Yugoslavia unprovoked? Was that a nasty business? NATO attacking Libya, unprovoked, was that a nasty business? The USA attacking Afghanistan unprovoked, was that a nasty business?
    - throwaway3060 8mo ago
      Going after the monsters that murdered thousands of Americans was entirely justified. Russia's problem is that all their reasons for invading Ukraine, they made up. The very people Russia claims to have been 'saving', are the ones that they are disproportionately killing.
    - _zagj 8mo ago
      > USA attacking Afghanistan unprovoked Unprovoked? This has to be one of the dumbest, most ahistorical bits of tankiespew I've ever read on this site.
- slowmovintarget 8mo ago
  So the only thing you're actually interested in is arguing "Trump bad." Iran's religious leadership has been sponsoring terror throughout the world for the last 40 years. Jimmy Carter was duped by the British into causing the rise of Shia Islam there. Khamenei and his leadership had escape locations prepared in Venezuela. The U.S. rolled those up first, nabbing the leader of a criminal cartel (Maduro) in the process. Now Israel and the U.S. have taken out Iran's oppressive "supreme leader" at a moment in history when the Iranian people are struggling for their own freedom. Khamenei was a bad guy. Maduro is a bad guy. They've put evil and harm out into the world and you're wringing your hands about it because it was Trump that stopped them? "By G'Quan, I can't recall the last time I was in a fight like that. No moral ambiguity, no .. hopeless battle against ancient and overwhelming forces. They were the bad guys, as you say, we were the good guys. And they made a very satisfying thump when they hit the floor." -- G'Kar

erxam 8mo ago

[flagged]