3 ms·
Siteshamer – Get brutally honest feedback on any website
- verdverm 8mo agoWhat does it say about itself, since you won't let us put it in there
- pinin 8mo agoJust check the website on Google pagespeed and you’ll know. Near 100 score on desktop.
- verdverm 8mo agoPage speed is not feedback, that's a metric
- pinin 8mo agoYou can get a feedback based on metrics, but the only real feedback comes from actual users. What’s your feedback on Siteshamer?
- verdverm 8mo agoMore slop hitting HN
- pinin 8mo agoJudging by your profile I suggest you to take a break from HN and get some fresh air! Thanks for the feedback, but AI would have done better :)
- verdverm 8mo agoPersonal attacks get you reported to HN, lashing out works against you, if you need a personal reason. This is not how decent people speak to each other. Please review the Guidelines and FAQ at the bottom of most pages.
- pinin 8mo agoSaying that AI gives better feedback than an old user who calls hard work “slop” is not a personal attack, it’s just the truth. Nothing personal. If reporting me makes you feel better then go ahead and do that! :)
- bediger4000 8mo agoI tried it. Overall, LLM "AI" is not beating the stereotypes. The "honest" feedback is shallow, facile, surface level. Your "AI" concentrated on my use of Hugo 108, which is admittedly well behind the times, as some kind of security problem. That shows zero understanding. Hugo is a static site generator. My web site doesn't have much attack surface because it' a set of HTML files. The LLM also doesn't exhibit any understanding of aesthetics or human motivation. Sure, my website jumps from topic to topic, but that's what I do. Maybe it's not marketable and doesn't have a coherent "brand" (whatever that might be). But so what? I'm not selling shit. I realize that humans are not clankers, and thus look for advice on LLDP one day, and discussion of Permian fossils another. Your "AI" would have everything be a median slurry that all looks and sounds the same. Which you should avoid. Your site looks pretty much the same as every other "AI" slop website. I would also beg you to remove the beam from your own eye. Whatever weird beard generated HTML and JavaScript your "AI" site uses causes confusing jumping around while scrolling. The "branding" might be uniform and consistent, but so is oatmeal. You should avoid using "AI" to create replies to feedback. The obtuse optimism doesn't indicate sincerity to readers, and further comes off as insulting and condescending. Any feedback is valuable, even negative, insulting feedback. Someone took time to write their answers to you, even if you didn't take much time to write the questions. Clankers should be grateful that humans stoop to reply.
- bediger4000 8mo agoA little bit more feedback, way more than you deserve: Don't hide your user agent. Check robots.txt for your honest user agent. Be a good net citizen. Look at more than about 20 pieces of content. You're probably getting a skewed view of the overall content. Don't rely on Google for a starting point. This, too, probably skews the view of the content.