3 ms·
Here's the original paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3795 http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3795 [pdf] http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.3795v1 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.3795
by scythe 14y ago
Here's the original paper:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3795 http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3795
[pdf] http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.3795v1 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.3795v1
So let's clear up some misconceptions: First, this is not a problem specific to Copenhagen or any other interpretation of QM. Second, it is not just the EPR paradox. Third, it is not the first time someone has proposed a system utilizing quantum entanglement for superluminal communication; that title goes to Karl Popper:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poppers_experiment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poppers_experiment
Popper's experiment was a very clever way to get around the no-communication theorem. It was eventually performed, but no FLT communication could be observed [some suggest we need to keep looking]. I presume that this new paper is another clever way to avoid the NCT, but I don't have time to read it at the moment.