3 ms·
> I get that they rely on people not using all of their quota They have no problem with users using their quota on their own software. Because they get the sig
by NitpickLawyer 8mo ago
> I get that they rely on people not using all of their quota
They have no problem with users using their quota on their own software. Because they get the signals. They do have a problem with users using the API in 3rd party software, because they don't get the signals.
- falcor84 8mo agoWell ... the clear signal is that people want to use Google's models but not Google products
- theblazehen 8mo agoMost people have actually just been using Opus through antigravity
- falcor84 8mo agoThat's very different from what I'm seeing around me, but yes, I suppose that happens to. And I guess Google wouldn't have as much of an issue with that, right?
- theblazehen 8mo agoAh, in my spaces (Involved in the proxy dev), most people have been using it for Opus. I suspect they may even have more of an issue with it, as they don't get the cost advantage of serving an in-house model
- xiphias2 8mo agoI don't really understand this reasoning actually: if OpenClaw usage go up, and a service (OpenAI it looks like) gets lots of usage data for personal assistent usage, they can optimize to make it better for people who get a $200 subscription just because of that use case.
- smashah 8mo agoI turned off tracking on Antigravity. Do I deserve to get my account banned from a service I pay for now? Silly.