3 ms·
> This is genuinely Well, I have a good guess which of those models is your favorite. I'm not even saying that Claude wrote this - because it still reads as h
by LordDragonfang 8mo ago
> This is genuinely
Well, I have a good guess which of those models is your favorite.
I'm not even saying that Claude wrote this - because it still reads as human written, and it's not badly written - but it has just enough Claude voice in it that it feels like the thing where humans inevitably start talking like the people (or simulacrums thereof) that they interact with most. (Heck, you did "It's not X it's Y" twice)
...Or maybe I'm the crazy one here. I don't know. But if I'm right, it's fascinating to see this happen.
- TheFlyingFish 8mo agoIf you're crazy then I am too. 50% odds it was written by a human, 50% bot.
- Aerbil313 8mo agoYou're not crazy. I feel it might be a case of LLM-brain, a person who interacts with LLMs so much they start talking like them.
- surgical_fire 8mo agoI spoke things such as "this is genuinely" for a long time before LLMs. I am worried people will think I use LLMs in my posts. This sort of sucks. I am also not a native English speaker, which doubly sucks in this case; while I am fluent, I not always know what sounds natural in English.
- Gander5739 8mo agoI think it's hard to say what sounds natural, and what is a stylistic flaw that is nevertheless natural to say. For instance in your comment you say > for a long time before LLMs. The double use of the sound "fore" (in "for" and "before") can sound jarring. Similarly "This sort of" feels a bit off to me, though I'm not sure a could definitively say why. Maybe it's a bit of a garden-path sentence; it looks like the noun "sort" before becoming the adverb "sort of". Or maybe this is just some kind of peculiarity I've picked up and your writing is perfectly natural.