2 ms·
> My understanding is that it’s about What is "it" in your comment? The refusal to sign a contract with Anthropic, or their designation as a supply chain risk
by dataflow 7mo ago
> My understanding is that it’s about
What is "it" in your comment?
The refusal to sign a contract with Anthropic, or their designation as a supply chain risk?
- layer8 7mo agoI was answering “What, then, is this really about?” By “this”, presumably they meant “the dispute”.
- dataflow 7mo agoThe dispute is over the supply chain risk designation though, not over the refusal to sign a contract. If only the latter had happened, we wouldn't be talking here. You're explaining why the department wouldn't want contractors to dictate the terms of usage of their products and services (the latter), but not why this designation would be seen as necessary even in their own eyes (the former).